Adverse Drug Reaction Trainer

New-onset agitation and grandiose ideas in a patient started on high-dose steroids

A pharmacovigilance case for causality assessment: work out which drug is responsible, grade the reaction's severity and seriousness, and defend a causality category using the Naranjo probability scale.

Naranjo probability scale

Framework
Naranjo probability scale
You decide
Suspect drug, reaction, severity, seriousness, causality

The case

A 45-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was admitted to the rheumatology ward with a disease flare, comprising a facial rash, polyarthritis, and fever. Her regular medication was hydroxychloroquine 200 mg twice daily, which she had taken for three years. On admission, she was started on prednisolone 60 mg once daily for the flare, and ibuprofen 400 mg three times daily for joint pain. She had no history of psychiatric illness and had not taken systemic corticosteroids in the preceding twelve months.

The first six days of admission were unremarkable: her fever settled, joint pain improved, and the rash began to fade. On day 7, the nursing staff noted that she was restless and had not slept for two nights. On review, she was agitated, talkative, and expressed grandiose ideas, insisting that she had found a cure for lupus. She was oriented in time and place, but her insight was limited. There were no hallucinations or mood-congruent delusions. Her vital signs were stable, temperature 36.8°C, blood pressure 128/76 mmHg, and she was apyrexial. Neurological examination was normal, with no focal deficits or meningism.

Blood tests on day 7 showed haemoglobin 10.2 g/dL, white cell count 9.1 × 10⁹/L, CRP 45 mg/L (down from 80 on admission), creatinine 62 µmol/L, ALT 28 IU/L, and normal electrolytes. Complement C3 and C4 were slightly reduced, and anti-dsDNA antibodies were elevated, consistent with active SLE. A urine dipstick for illicit drugs was negative. Blood cultures and urine cultures were sterile. MRI of the brain was reported as normal, and an EEG showed no epileptiform activity. Lumbar puncture was considered, but not performed given the absence of focal signs and the low suspicion of neuropsychiatric lupus.

The clinical team considered whether her new psychiatric symptoms could be due to neuropsychiatric lupus, but the absence of focal neurological signs, the normal MRI and EEG, and the fact that her inflammatory markers were improving made this less likely. The temporal relationship with the introduction of prednisolone, seven days before symptom onset, and the abrupt onset of symptoms after a period of improvement, suggested a drug-related cause. Over the next three days, the prednisolone dose was tapered to 10 mg daily. Her agitation and insomnia resolved within 48 hours, and the grandiose ideas diminished over five days. She remained on hydroxychloroquine and ibuprofen throughout. A deliberate rechallenge with prednisolone was not performed, but she was subsequently maintained on a lower dose of 7.5 mg daily without recurrence of symptoms. The episode prolonged her hospital stay by an additional week. A psychiatric opinion confirmed the diagnosis of an acute, reversible psychosis, and she was managed with supportive care and a small dose of a short-acting anxiolytic for a few days.

This case highlights the need to consider drug-related causes for behavioural changes in patients with inflammatory diseases, especially when multiple agents are used. The patient's age, the high dose of prednisolone, and the absence of a prior psychiatric history are notable factors.

What you are asked to do

  • Identify which of the patient's drugs is the suspect, and say why the others are not.
  • Name the reaction and grade its severity.
  • Decide whether it is serious by regulatory criteria, which is not the same as severe.
  • Assign a causality category under the Naranjo probability scale and justify it from the timeline, the dechallenge and the alternative causes.
  • State the management and what should be reported.

The suspect drug and the graded answer are deliberately not on this page: working them out is the exercise.

Log in to assess "New-onset agitation and grandiose ideas in a patient started on high-dose steroids"

A free account opens the trainer: name the suspect drug, grade the reaction and commit to a causality category, then see how your assessment compares and why.

More like this

Educational content for students and clinicians in training. It does not replace professional judgement, local protocols or current prescribing information.