Editorial standards
Who checks the content, and when
Teaching material about medicines has to be right. This page says who reviews what is published here, which prescribing references and curriculum it is checked against, and how you can tell on any page when it was last reviewed.
How content is published
- 1
Authored or drafted. Faculty write monographs, cases and stations directly, or start from an AI draft. A draft is marked as AI-generated and cannot be published in that state.
- 2
Reviewed and signed off. A named reviewer checks the item against the stated prescribing references and records a dated sign-off. The reviewer and the date are shown on the item's public page and inside the platform.
- 3
Re-reviewed on change. Edits create a new version. The most recent sign-off is what a page shows, so an item edited after its last review says so by the date.
The reviewers
Reviewer profiles have not been published yet. Until they are, no page on this site claims a named review.
Review coverage
| Content | Published | With a dated review | Most recent review |
|---|---|---|---|
| drug monographs | 248 | 0 | None yet |
| prescribing scenarios | 50 | 0 | None yet |
| clinical cases | 49 | 0 | None yet |
| OSCE stations | 44 | 0 | None yet |
| ADR cases | 46 | 0 | None yet |
| courses | 11 | 0 | None yet |
Counts are of globally published content and update as reviews are recorded. Content authored privately by an institution for its own learners is reviewed by that institution and is not counted here.
Everything on this site is for education and training. It does not replace professional judgement, local protocols or current prescribing information. See the medical disclaimer.