Acute kidney injury in a diabetic man after contrast CT
A pharmacovigilance case for causality assessment: work out which drug is responsible, grade the reaction's severity and seriousness, and defend a causality category using the Naranjo probability scale.
Naranjo probability scale
- Framework
- Naranjo probability scale
- You decide
- Suspect drug, reaction, severity, seriousness, causality
The case
Mr. AB, a 72-year-old man with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia, presented to the emergency department with nausea and malaise two days after a contrast-enhanced CT scan. His regular medications were metformin 1000 mg twice daily, lisinopril 20 mg once daily, and atorvastatin 40 mg once daily, which he had taken for several years. On day 0, he received intravenous iohexol 300 mg iodine/ml, 100 ml, during a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis performed to investigate abdominal pain. His serum creatinine was 130 µmol/L before the scan. On day 2, his creatinine was 290 µmol/L. He had no clinical signs of dehydration, hypotension, or infection. Urinalysis showed no blood, protein, or leucocytes. Renal ultrasound showed normal kidneys without obstruction. He had continued taking all his medications, including metformin, after the scan. On admission, metformin and lisinopril were withheld, and intravenous fluids were administered. Over the next five days, his serum creatinine gradually fell to 170 µmol/L. A review of his drug history noted that he had tolerated lisinopril and atorvastatin indefinitely, and there was no recent change. The differential diagnosis included contrast-induced nephropathy, acute interstitial nephritis from a drug, and progression of diabetic nephropathy. No rechallenge was performed.
What you are asked to do
- Identify which of the patient's drugs is the suspect, and say why the others are not.
- Name the reaction and grade its severity.
- Decide whether it is serious by regulatory criteria, which is not the same as severe.
- Assign a causality category under the Naranjo probability scale and justify it from the timeline, the dechallenge and the alternative causes.
- State the management and what should be reported.
The suspect drug and the graded answer are deliberately not on this page: working them out is the exercise.
Log in to assess "Acute kidney injury in a diabetic man after contrast CT"
A free account opens the trainer: name the suspect drug, grade the reaction and commit to a causality category, then see how your assessment compares and why.
Taught in
More like this
- Confusion and Severe Hyponatraemia in an 82-Year-Old Woman on Multiple Medications
- Severe Lactic Acidosis and Acute Kidney Injury in a 74-Year-Old Woman
- Prolonged hypoglycaemia in an 84-year-old man with chronic kidney disease
- Acute dystonia in a 22-year-old man after haloperidol
- Acute wheeze after aspirin in a woman with asthma and nasal polyps
- Agitation, sweating and hyperreflexia after adding tramadol to sertraline
Educational content for students and clinicians in training. It does not replace professional judgement, local protocols or current prescribing information.